BMW X2 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| BMW X2 and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but BMW X2 torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.74 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`535 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 700 kg | |
| BMW X2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Land Rover Freelander. Therefore, Land Rover Freelander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |