BMW X2 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 165 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X2 and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. BMW X2 has 93 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`115 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |