BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| BMW X2 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, but BMW X2 torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Karoq. BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | 2`128 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`516 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 612 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |