BMW X2 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X2 engine produces 109 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija, BMW 4 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine: The B38 1.5-liter three-cylinder petrol engine, introduced in 2013, was designed with a focus on fuel efficiency and low emissions to meet modern environmental standards. While it received generally positive ... More about BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.66 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 30 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`005 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 650 kg | |
| BMW X2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |