BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 81 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X2 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`128 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`620 kg | 1`516 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 612 kg | |
| BMW X2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |