BMW X2 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 66 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 9.6 | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X2 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.74 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X2 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |