BMW X2 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 190 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 265 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X2 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X2 and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. BMW X2 has 93 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |