BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 156 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X2 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |