BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. BMW X2 engine produces 2 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Despite the higher power, BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X2 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |