BMW X2 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 855 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.85 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`190 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`600 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 490 kg | |
| BMW X2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, BMW X2 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |