BMW X2 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 855 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.85 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |