BMW X2 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 40 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.74 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X2 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |