BMW X2 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X2) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 74 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X2 and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. BMW X2 has 93 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |