BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X2 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`190 kg | 2`188 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 643 kg | |
| BMW X2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |