BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 75 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |