BMW X2 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 60 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X2 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.59 m | |
| BMW X2 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X2 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW X2 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |