BMW X2 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X2) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi ASX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 205 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.64 m | |
| BMW X2 and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage capacity. BMW X2 has 64 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X2 (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |