BMW X2 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 40 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| BMW X2 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |