BMW X2 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 40 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.65 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 8 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 121 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |