BMW X2 2017 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X2 engine produces 50 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.64 m | |
| BMW X2 is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X2 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW X2 has 12 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |