BMW X2 2017 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X2) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Cupra Ateca) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. BMW X2 engine produces 110 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the BMW X2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.62 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Cupra Ateca, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |