BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 306 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 450 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.6 seconds | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 6.1 | 4.5 - 5.3 | |
|
BMW X2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, BMW X2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`135 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |