BMW X2 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. BMW X2 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 306 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 450 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.6 seconds | 7.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 6.1 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
BMW X2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, a BMW X2 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 147 - 182 mm (5.8 - 7.2 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Karoq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. BMW X2 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`135 | ~ 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |