BMW X2 2017 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW X2 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford C-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 306 HP | 95 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 450 NM | 150 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.6 seconds | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 6.1 | 4.6 - 6.6 | |
|
On average, the BMW X2 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford C-Max. On average, BMW X2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X2 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1355 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW X2 has 38 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 329 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means BMW X2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`135 | ~ 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |