BMW X1 2009 vs Subaru XV 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 108 HP more power than Subaru XV, whereas torque is 114 NM more than Subaru XV. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X1 could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru XV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X1 2009 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 and Subaru XV are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1270 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Subaru XV, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Subaru XV has
| |