BMW X1 2009 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 17 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.74 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 335 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |