BMW X1 2009 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X1 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2011: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.66 m | |
| BMW X1 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 92 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 81 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |