BMW X1 2009 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 37 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X1 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.63 m | |
| BMW X1 is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1277 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 86 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |