BMW X1 2012 vs BMW X1 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
BMW X1 2012 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 2012 engine produces 27 HP more power than BMW X1 2010, whereas torque is 70 NM more than BMW X1 2010. Thanks to more power BMW X1 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
The BMW X1 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 2012 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1 2010, which means that by driving the BMW X1 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 2012 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1 2010. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
BMW X1 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW X1 2012: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
BMW X1 2010 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X1 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 2012 is 2 cm longer than the BMW X1 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1350 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`180 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | BMW X1 2012 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 2010 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than BMW X1 2012, so BMW X1 2012 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
BMW X1 has
| |