BMW X1 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X1 engine produces 61 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.71 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1350 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 83 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 2`058 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |