BMW X1 2012 vs Subaru XV 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 196 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 34 HP more power than Subaru XV, whereas torque is 74 NM more than Subaru XV. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Subaru XV is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X1 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X1 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru XV engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 is 3 cm longer than the Subaru XV, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X1 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1270 litres | |
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 80 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Subaru XV, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Subaru XV has
| |