BMW X1 2012 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 80 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.74 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 458 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |