BMW X1 2012 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 74 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
| BMW X1 is 3 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X1 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. This could mean that the BMW X1 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`943 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW X1 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |