BMW X1 2015 vs Volvo XC40 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 81 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X1 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X1 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
BMW X1 has 4x4: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
| BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| BMW X1 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
| |