BMW X1 2015 vs Hyundai Tucson 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 141 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 90 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
By specification BMW X1 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X1 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW X1 has 4x4: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X1 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on BMW X2 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 513 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1503 litres | |
BMW X1 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 47 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`085 | |
Safety: | |||
The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
BMW X1 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Tucson, so BMW X1 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 16 200 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |