BMW X1 2015 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 50 HP more power than Jeep Patriot, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Jeep Patriot. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.6 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X1 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Patriot, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
BMW X1 has 4x4: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Patriot engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Journey, Dodge Caliber | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
|
BMW X1 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X1 is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Patriot, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW X1 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1777 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X1 has 147 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. This could mean that the BMW X1 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 227 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |