BMW X1 2016 vs BMW X1 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
BMW X1 2016 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 2016 engine produces 6 HP more power than BMW X1 2012, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X1 2012. Thanks to more power BMW X1 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 61 litres | |
860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW X1 2012: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW X1 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2016 2.0 engine BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
BMW X1 2016 is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X1 2012, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X1 2016 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1350 litres | |
BMW X1 2016 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X1 2016 has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1 2012. The BMW X1 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 2016 (by 200 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X1 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X1 2012, which means BMW X1 2016 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | |||
The BMW X1 2016 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | BMW X1 2016 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 2012 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than BMW X1 2016, so BMW X1 2016 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
BMW X1 has
| |