BMW X1 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 187 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 38 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW X1 2012: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.67 m | |
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 577 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1705 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 157 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 355 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`110 | |
Safety: | |||
The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 10 600 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |