BMW X1 2010 vs Audi Q5 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X1 engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q5 2009 2.0 engine: The engine is widely criticized for excessive oil consumption, which is one of the most common complaints from owners. This issue, partially addressed by the manufacturer by the end of 2011, persists in high-mileage engines. The primary solution is ... More about Audi Q5 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.65 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 18 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 10 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |