BMW X1 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 26 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X1 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X1 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.72 m | |
| BMW X1 is 9 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X1 has 166 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the BMW X1 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 402 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X1, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |