BMW X1 2010 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 2012 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X1 2010 engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW X1 2012, whereas torque is 70 NM less than BMW X1 2012. Due to the lower power, BMW X1 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 2010 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X1 2010 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 2010 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. BMW X1 2012: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
| BMW X1 2010 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X1 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 2010 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X1 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1350 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | BMW X1 2012 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 2010 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than BMW X1 2012, so BMW X1 2012 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
BMW X1 has
| |