BMW X1 2009 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X1 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X1 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 258 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.1 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
BMW X1 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, BMW X1 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.71 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 18 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1350 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`109 kg | ~ 2`499 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`611 kg | ~ 1`814 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 498 kg | ~ 685 kg | |
| BMW X1 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |