BMW X1 2009 vs Mazda CX-5 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW X1
2009 - 2012
Mazda CX-5
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X1 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X1 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 143 - 258 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 200 - 400 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 10.1 seconds7.9 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 9.44.6 - 7.3
BMW X1 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, BMW X1 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.54 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.55 m1.69 m
BMW X1 is smaller.
BMW X1 is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1350 litres1620 litres
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space.
BMW X1 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`109~ 2`045
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 90009600
Pros and Cons: BMW X1 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv