BMW 6 series 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 450 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 6 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 6 series engine produces 111 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power BMW 6 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 6 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the BMW 6 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 6 series consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 6 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.84 m | |
|
BMW 6 series is smaller. BMW 6 series is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 18 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 6 series is 47 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. BMW 6 series has 90 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 6 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means BMW 6 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 50 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 6 sērija has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |