BMW 6 series 2017 vs Volvo S90 2018
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. BMW 6 series engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo S90, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, BMW 6 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.6 | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 6 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the BMW 6 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.44 m | |
|
BMW 6 series is larger. BMW 6 series is 13 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 6 series is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 500 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 6 series has 110 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 6 series is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, butBMW 6 series is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 6 sērija has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |