BMW 6 series 2004 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.8 (petrol) | 1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 - 367 HP | 163 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 490 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 7.2 seconds | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 13.0 | 7.5 - 14.4 | |
|
BMW 6 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
BMW 6 series is larger, but lower. BMW 6 series is 17 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 12 cm wider, while the height of BMW 6 series is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 6 series has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the BMW 6 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 6 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 6 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`194 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 6 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |