BMW 4 series 2024 vs Audi A6 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| BMW 4 series engine produces 14 HP less power than Audi A6, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 4 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 16 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | 995 litres | |
| BMW 4 series has 60 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 4 series (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`255 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`705 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 615 kg | |
| BMW 4 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Audi A6. Therefore, Audi A6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi A6 has
| |