BMW 4 series 2016 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 4 series engine produces 57 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 225 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 73 litres | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Malibu) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Malibu engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 4 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 545 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage space. BMW 4 series has 65 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`539 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |