BMW 4 series 2013 vs Volvo S60 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
BMW 4 series engine produces 6 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. Despite less power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The BMW 4 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 4 series consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1810 km on highway | ||
900 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 4 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | 1749 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 4 series has 101 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 449 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 19 000 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |