BMW 4 series 2013 vs Volvo S60 2015

 
BMW 4 series
2013 - 2017
Volvo S60
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP190 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds7.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 4 series engine produces 6 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.73.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1210 km in combined cycle1710 km in combined cycle
1390 km on highway1860 km on highway
960 km with real consumption1170 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)124 mm (4.9 inches)
BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ...  More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 mno data
Height: 1.39 m1.48 m
Trunk capacity: 481 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1300 litres1749 litres
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 4 series has 101 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 449 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0702`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18 80011 800
Pros and Cons: BMW 4 sērija has
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv