BMW 4 series 2017 vs Audi A4 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (BMW 4 series) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Audi A4) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 4 series engine produces 102 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 10.30 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A4) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 12 cm shorter than the Audi A4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 460 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Audi A4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`035 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 33 800 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi A4 has
| |