BMW 4 series 2017 vs Volkswagen Passat 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| BMW 4 series and Volkswagen Passat have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Passat) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 4 series is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 586 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. BMW 4 series has 106 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |